The Scope of Practice Review examined the barriers and incentives health professionals face working to their full scope of practice in primary care.
“Throughout this Review, we have aimed to use inclusive and respectful language and nationally accepted definitions, including those provided by the Department of Health and Aged Care, where available. We acknowledge that there are many different definitions for some of the included terms, and that some may disagree with the chosen definitions included in the Glossary.
We note that primary care rests on the contributions of many. For this reason, it is not practical to always include all health care providers or professions when describing the broad multidisciplinary primary care team. We acknowledge, for example, the many health professions who contribute to the allied health workforce and recognise that each contribute specific and significant expertise. Use of the term ‘allied health’ is not intended to in any way to diminish this unique professional expertise. Similarly, the Review has sought the views across the breadth of the primary care team and acknowledges the significant and increasing contribution of the assistant, support and technician workforces. It is hoped that the recommendations made in the Review will support and advance these important workforces.
The fundamental need for all health care, including primary care, to focus on the needs and preferences of the consumer cannot be overstated. Both the terms ‘consumer’ and ‘patient’ have been used throughout this document to indicate a person who has used or may potentially use health services (as defined in the Glossary). We also acknowledge the vital role of those in carer and support roles. The term ‘patient’ is commonly used in legislation and other references quoted throughout this report.”